-
Technology
-
Industry
-
Solutions
-
- ASSET MANAGEMENT
- CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE MANAGEMENT
- CYBER SECURITY
- DATA CENTER
- DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT
- ELECTRONIC DATA INTERCHANGE
- ENTERPRISE DATA MANAGEMENT
- ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING
- ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT
- ENTERPRISE-GRADE WEB DATA SOLUTIONS
- FACILITY MANAGEMENT
- FIELD SERVICE
- IDENTITY AND ACCESS MANAGEMENT
- INFRASTRUCTURE
- IT SERVICE MANAGEMENT
- MANAGED IT SERVICES
- PAYMENT AND CARD
- PROJECT MANAGEMENT
- SOFTWARE TESTING
- STORAGE
- VIDEO SOLUTIONS
- WORKFLOW
-
-
Platforms
-
Functions
- Leadership Perspectives
- Innovation Insights
- Research
- Magazines
- News
- CXO Awards


School districts regularly invest huge sums in professional development (PD) programs for teachers to continually refine their teaching skills and keep abreast of the latest curriculum to benefit students. Does that mean students’ poor academic performances are always a reflection of their teacher’s failing to effectively deliver the PD lessons? Conversely, does a student’s exceptional track record necessarily imply that the teacher has made the most of these training sessions and developed engaging ways of learning? No. Rather, school districts are often overwhelmed with so many requirements that assessing the efficacy of PD programs that their effect on students is often neglected. To help districts optimize their PD investments and positively impact students’ learning, Texas-based Project Education provides a proven methodology for evaluating how productively teachers implement their PD courses. 

