An Introduction to Linux Container and Threats
The idea of container technology first appeared around the 2000s, as a technology that allows partitioning of FreeBSD system into multiple subsystems. Then, the concept of Jails was developed as safe environments that a system admin could share with various users within an organization. In a jail, the actual intent was to get processes created in a tailored environment where all access including networking is virtualized, restricting an escape, or compromising of the system. Moreover, with limited resources and techniques, Jails were facing limited implementations and as time passed, jail escaping techniques were also discovered eventually.
With time, the Linux container technology concepts evolved into the arena, making a rapid change. Today, the Linux containers are technologies that allow to package and isolate applications with their entire runtime environment—all of the files necessary to run. This makes it easy to move the contained application between environments while retaining the application’s full functionality. Moreover, the Linux containers help reduce conflicts between organizations development and operations teams by separating areas of responsibility and allowing developers focus on their apps while the operations team focus on the infrastructure. Also, as Linux containers are based on open source technology, the user gets the latest and greatest advancement as soon as they’re available.
Following the evolution path of cyber technology solutions, Cyber threats also evolved. Even the modern containers can suffer from most of the threats common to both single-OS server environments and virtualized server environments. General threats to container security include:
1. Containers forced to use up system resources can lead to slow down or even crash the whole system
2. Various types of Distributed Denial of Service attacks basically on the application level
3. In public containers, there are chances of cross-scripting as well as general scripting attacks
4. Containers already compromised can download additional support malware, worms, and ransomware
5. Allowing unauthorized access and guest users without policies can harm the container security
6. Live patching of applications to introduce malicious processes
7. Use of insecure applications to flood the network and affect other containers
Security can be improved not only with the knowledge about general threats but also by studying about prominent attack types. Take a look at some of the major attack types that containers face:
1. Buffer overflow, as well as heap corruption in various libraries including the Ruby and Python, allows execution of malicious program codes in the system
2. The Dirty Cow exploit that basically targets the Linux kernels allows escalation of root privileges on the container
3. OpenSSL heap corruption caused by malformed key header
4. Crash can be caused by the presence of a specific extension
5. For stealing sensitive information, SQL injection attacks are widely adopted by attackers allowing them to gain control of the complete database
6. Vulnerabilities like stack-based buffer overflow and the man-in-the-middle attacks causes serious effects
7. As in the other software systems, any zero-day attack on the containers also represents an on-going threat
With numerous threats around containers for a better understanding of why run-time security is so critical, consider the applications complete lifecycle. The product developed, tested, packed and then deployed in just a few months may be shared across numerous instances worldwide. This makes run-time by far the greater window of attack. So maintaining and managing the security of these systems need a good base of security threats, knowledge of security layers and more over a better experience in dealing with cyber attacks in containers.
By Michael Cockrill, CIO, State of Washington
By Brett Shockley, SVP & CIO, Avaya
By Sven Gerjets, SVP-IT, DIRECTV
By Steve Moyer, VP of Storage Software Engineering, Micron...
By Michelle R. McKenna-Doyle, SVP and CIO, National Football...
By Patrick Hale, CIO, VITAS Healthcare
By Roman Trakhtenberg, CEO, Luxoft
By Julia Davis, SVP, CIO, Aflac
By Chris Westlake, VP & GM of Service,RK
By Pauly Comtois, VP DevOps, Hearst Business Media
By Yanni Charalambous, VP & CIO, Occidental Petroleum...
By Bob Brown, VP-Production & Operations, ONE World Sports
By Arthur Hu, SVP & CIO, Lenovo
By Ron Guerrier, CIO, Farmers Insurance Group, Inc.
By Scott Cardenas, CIO, City and County of Denver
By Kevin McCarron, Vice President Collaboration, Carousel...
By Marc Kermisch, VP & CIO, Red Wing Shoe Co.
By Christopher Frenz, AVP of Information Security,...
By Brian Drozdowicz, VP, Digital Services, Siemens...
By Les Ottolenghi, EVP and CIO, Caesars Entertainment