-
Technology
-
Industry
-
Solutions
-
- ASSET MANAGEMENT
- CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE MANAGEMENT
- CYBER SECURITY
- DATA CENTER
- DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT
- ELECTRONIC DATA INTERCHANGE
- ENTERPRISE DATA MANAGEMENT
- ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING
- ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT
- ENTERPRISE-GRADE WEB DATA SOLUTIONS
- FACILITY MANAGEMENT
- FIELD SERVICE
- IDENTITY AND ACCESS MANAGEMENT
- INFRASTRUCTURE
- IT SERVICE MANAGEMENT
- MANAGED IT SERVICES
- PAYMENT AND CARD
- PROJECT MANAGEMENT
- SOFTWARE TESTING
- STORAGE
- VIDEO SOLUTIONS
- WORKFLOW
-
-
Platforms
-
Functions
- Leadership Perspectives
- Innovation Insights
- Research
- Magazines
- News
- CXO Awards

Developers find building software on reusable parts quite resourceful. This trend, touted as “componentization” essentially involves disintegration of a code into interchangeable segments. The approach helps developers to gain an edge in the market by deploying software faster, while ensuring quality and cost effectiveness. However, componentization has its own pitfalls, which become highly prominent in test environments. “Software has become more componentized, which means testing it is much more complicated. This also makes development more of a team effort, which also increases test complexity,” expresses Tom Nolle, President, CIMI Corporation, a strategic consulting company. Implementing ALM successfully in development environments isn’t a cakewalk anymore as unforeseen collisions among the components continue to impede the process. Moreover, software development and change cycles tend to affect aspects such as compliance, utility, and security if not administered properly. The use of conventional resources makes it practically impossible to test and deploy software efficiently in such environment. Threat modeling can serve as a precautionary measure in earlier stages helping enterprises to compile a list of vulnerabilities which could affect them, besides helping them ascertain their position.