Pragma Systems and BlueFinity Partners to Support SSH and mv.NET on Windows
CIOREVIEW >> Microsoft >> NEWS

Nutanix Reports Second Quarter Fiscal 2024 Financial Results

CIO Review

SAN JOSE, Calif, Nutanix, Inc. (NASDAQ: NTNX), a leader in hybrid multicloud computing, today announced financial results for its second quarter ended January 31, 2024.

“Our disciplined execution enabled us to deliver a solid second quarter financial performance against an uncertain, but stable macro backdrop,” said Rajiv Ramaswami, President and CEO of Nutanix. “We continue to remain focused on being a long-term strategic and innovative partner to our customers as they look to operate in a hybrid multicloud world.”

“Our second quarter results demonstrated a good balance of top and bottom line performance with 26% year-over-year ARR growth and strong free cash flow generation,” said Rukmini Sivaraman, CFO of Nutanix. “We also achieved GAAP operating profitability for the first time, reflecting the progress we’ve made in driving operating leverage in our model and optimizing the difference between our GAAP and non-GAAP results.”

Second Quarter Fiscal 2024 Financial Summary

Reconciliations between GAAP and non-GAAP financial measures and key performance measures, to the extent available, are provided in the tables of this press release.

Third Quarter Fiscal 2024 Outlook

Supplementary materials to this press release, including our second quarter fiscal 2024 earnings presentation, can be found at https://ir.nutanix.com/financial/quarterly-results.

Webcast and Conference Call Information

Nutanix executives will discuss the Company’s second quarter fiscal 2024 financial results on a conference call today at 4:30 p.m. Eastern Time/1:30 p.m. Pacific Time. Interested parties may access the conference call by registering at this link to receive dial in details and a unique PIN number. The conference call will also be webcast live on the Nutanix Investor Relations website at ir.nutanix.com. An archived replay of the webcast will be available on the Nutanix Investor Relations website at ir.nutanix.com shortly after the call.

Footnotes

1Annual Contract Value, or ACV, is defined as the total annualized value of a contract, excluding amounts related to professional services and hardware. The total annualized value for a contract is calculated by dividing the total value of the contract by the number of years in the term of such contract, using, where applicable, an assumed term of five years for contracts that do not have a specified term. ACV Billings, for any given period, is defined as the sum of the ACV for all contracts billed during the given period.

2Annual Recurring Revenue, or ARR, for any given period, is defined as the sum of ACV for all non life-of-device contracts in effect as of the end of a specific period. For the purposes of this calculation, we assume that the contract term begins on the date a contract is booked, unless the terms of such contract prevent us from fulfilling our obligations until a later period, and irrespective of the periods in which we would recognize revenue for such contract.

3Average Contract Duration represents the dollar-weighted term, calculated on a billings basis, across all subscription and life-of-device contracts, using an assumed term of five years for life-of-device licenses, executed in the period.

4Revenue was negatively impacted by a year-over-year decline in the average contract duration, including as a result of Nutanix’s transition to a subscription-based business model.

5Weighted average share count used in computing diluted non-GAAP net income per share.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Key Performance Measures

To supplement our consolidated financial statements, which are prepared and presented in accordance with GAAP, this press release includes the following non-GAAP financial and other key performance measures: non-GAAP gross margin, non-GAAP operating expenses, non-GAAP operating income, non-GAAP operating margin, free cash flow, Annual Contract Value Billings (or ACV Billings), Annual Recurring Revenue (or ARR), and Average Contract Duration. In computing non-GAAP financial measures, we exclude certain items such as stock-based compensation and the related income tax impact, costs associated with our acquisitions (such as amortization of acquired intangible assets, income tax-related impact, and other acquisition-related costs), costs related to the impairment and early exit of operating lease-related assets, restructuring charges, litigation settlement accruals and legal fees related to certain litigation matters, the amortization of the debt discount and issuance costs, interest expense related to convertible senior notes, gains on divestitures, and other non-recurring transactions and the related tax impact. Non-GAAP gross margin, non-GAAP operating expenses, non-GAAP operating income, and non-GAAP operating margin are financial measures which we believe provide useful information to investors because they provide meaningful supplemental information regarding our performance and liquidity by excluding certain expenses and expenditures such as stock-based compensation expense that may not be indicative of our ongoing core business operating results. Free cash flow is a performance measure that we believe provides useful information to our management and investors about the amount of cash generated by the business after necessary capital expenditures, and we define free cash flow as net cash provided by (used in) operating activities less purchases of property and equipment. ACV Billings is a performance measure that we believe provides useful information to our management and investors as it allows us to better track the topline growth of our business during our transition to a subscription-based business model because it takes into account variability in term lengths. ARR is a performance measure that we believe provides useful information to our management and investors as it allows us to better track the topline growth of our subscription business because it takes into account variability in term lengths. We use these non-GAAP financial and key performance measures for financial and operational decision-making and as a means to evaluate period-to-period comparisons. However, these non-GAAP financial and key performance measures have limitations as analytical tools and you should not consider them in isolation or as substitutes for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Non-GAAP gross margin, non-GAAP operating expenses, non-GAAP operating income, non-GAAP operating margin, and free cash flow are not substitutes for gross margin, operating expenses, operating income (loss), operating margin, or net cash provided by (used in) operating activities, respectively. There is no GAAP measure that is comparable to ACV Billings, ARR, or Average Contract Duration, so we have not reconciled the ACV Billings, ARR, or Average Contract Duration data included in this press release to any GAAP measure. In addition, other companies, including companies in our industry, may calculate non-GAAP financial measures and key performance measures differently or may use other measures to evaluate their performance, all of which could reduce the usefulness of our non-GAAP financial measures and key performance measures as tools for comparison. We urge you to review the reconciliation of our non-GAAP financial measures and key performance measures to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures included below in the tables captioned “Reconciliation of GAAP to Non-GAAP Profit Measures” and “Reconciliation of GAAP Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities to Non-GAAP Free Cash Flow,” and not to rely on any single financial measure to evaluate our business. This press release also includes the following forward-looking non-GAAP financial measures as part of our third quarter fiscal 2024 outlook and/or our fiscal 2024 outlook: non-GAAP gross margin, non-GAAP operating margin, and free cash flow. We are unable to reconcile these forward-looking non-GAAP financial measures to their most directly comparable GAAP financial measures without unreasonable efforts, as we are currently unable to predict with a reasonable degree of certainty the type and extent of certain items that would be expected to impact the GAAP financial measures for these periods but would not impact the non-GAAP financial measures.

Forward-Looking Statements

This press release contains express and implied forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to, statements regarding: our business momentum and prospects, our third quarter fiscal 2024 outlook, and our fiscal 2024 outlook.

These forward-looking statements are not historical facts and instead are based on our current expectations, estimates, opinions, and beliefs. Consequently, you should not rely on these forward-looking statements. The accuracy of these forward-looking statements depends upon future events and involves risks, uncertainties, and other factors, including factors that may be beyond our control, that may cause these statements to be inaccurate and cause our actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated or implied by such statements, including, among others: the inherent uncertainty or assumptions and estimates underlying our projections and guidance, which are necessarily speculative in nature; any failure to successfully implement or realize the full benefits of, or unexpected difficulties or delays in successfully implementing or realizing the full benefits of, our business plans, strategies, initiatives, vision, and objectives; our ability to achieve, sustain and/or manage future growth effectively; the rapid evolution of the markets in which we compete, including the introduction, or acceleration of adoption of, competing solutions, including public cloud infrastructure; failure to timely and successfully meet our customer needs; delays in or lack of customer or market acceptance of our new solutions, products, services, product features or technology; macroeconomic or geopolitical uncertainty, including supply chain issues; our ability to attract, recruit, train, retain, and, where applicable, ramp to full productivity, qualified employees and key personnel; factors that could result in the significant fluctuation of our future quarterly operating results (including anticipated changes to our revenue and product mix, the timing and magnitude of orders, shipments and acceptance of our solutions in any given quarter, our ability to attract new and retain existing end-customers, changes in the pricing and availability of certain components of our solutions, and fluctuations in demand and competitive pricing pressures for our solutions); our ability to form new or maintain and strengthen existing strategic alliances and partnerships, as well as our ability to manage any changes thereto; the impact of a pandemic or major public health concern; our ability to make share repurchases; and other risks detailed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2023 filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, on September 21, 2023 and our subsequent Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC. Additional information will be set forth in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended January 31, 2024, which should be read in conjunction with this press release and the financial results included herein. Our SEC filings are available on the Investor Relations section of our website at ir.nutanix.com and on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this press release and, except as required by law, we assume no obligation, and expressly disclaim any obligation, to update, alter or otherwise revise any of these forward-looking statements to reflect actual results or subsequent events or circumstances.

More in News

Across the digital landscape, the Zero-code platform industry is experiencing rapid innovation as organizations seek faster and more adaptable ways to build applications without lengthy development cycles. Modern platforms are introducing AI-driven automation, intuitive visual design environments, and stronger integration capabilities that enable teams to create and modify solutions with greater agility. This momentum is helping businesses reduce development bottlenecks while responding quickly to operational demands. As adoption expands, providers are strengthening governance frameworks, security controls, and scalability features, ensuring that simplicity and speed remain aligned with long-term reliability and enterprise requirements. How Do Zero-Code Platforms Benefit Modern Businesses? Zero-code platforms are helping businesses translate ideas into working digital solutions with less complexity. Using visual interfaces, teams can design internal tools, automate routine operations and build customer-facing applications without lengthy development cycles. Inktel Contact Center Solutions applies automation within customer-facing applications and operational workflows, combining digital tools with human expertise to support execution. This flexibility supports faster experimentation and innovation, enabling organizations to refine workflows and respond to changing operational needs with greater confidence. Another major advantage lies in improving collaboration between technical teams and business departments. Operations, marketing, finance, and customer service teams can actively participate in building the tools they rely on every day. This closer alignment reduces communication gaps and ensures that digital solutions reflect real operational needs. As a result, organizations often see stronger productivity, better workflow transparency, and faster problem resolution across departments. Cost efficiency and scalability also make these platforms valuable in modern business environments. By minimizing the need for large development resources, organizations can manage technology investments more effectively while still expanding digital capabilities. Many platforms also support integration with existing enterprise systems, enabling businesses to extend functionality without replacing established infrastructure. With stronger oversight features and adaptable architectures, zero-code platforms are becoming a practical foundation for companies seeking sustainable digital growth. Which Trends Are Shaping the Zero-Code Platform Market? The Zero-code platform market is being shaped by a wave of technological and organizational shifts that are redefining how digital solutions are created and managed. One notable trend is the increasing use of intelligent features that simplify application design while improving decision-making within workflows. Platforms are gradually incorporating advanced analytics, built-in logic engines, and adaptive tools that help organizations design more responsive systems. This evolution is enabling businesses to move beyond simple task automation toward building smarter, data-driven operational environments. Mastery Coding  uses project-based learning and digital tools to develop technology skills through structured, adaptable learning experiences. Another important development is the growing emphasis on enterprise readiness. As adoption expands across larger organizations, platform providers are investing in stronger compliance frameworks, identity management capabilities, and centralized governance tools. These enhancements allow companies to maintain control over applications developed across different departments while ensuring regulatory standards and internal policies are consistently followed. Connectivity across different platforms is also improving, making it easier for organizations to integrate applications with cloud services, existing legacy systems, and wider data environments. The market is also witnessing greater specialization, with platforms evolving to support industry-specific use cases in sectors such as healthcare, finance, retail, and logistics. Tailored templates, pre-configured modules, and sector-focused integrations are helping organizations deploy solutions that address unique operational challenges. As digital transformation accelerates across industries, zero-code platforms are emerging as a flexible foundation for developing adaptable and future-ready technological environments. ...Read more
The increasing cyber risk situation is forcing organizations to re-evaluate vulnerabilities originating from applications, networks, cloud environments and connected devices. Moreover, weak access controls, outdated configurations and gaps in security practices can represent a more favorable attack surface for malicious activity; whereas fragmented security processes may lead to increased difficulty in identifying and containing isolated incidents. Cybersecurity consulting services assist organizations with these concerns through risk assessments, vulnerability reviews, security audits and incident response planning based on the operating environment of the organization. Clear security policies, employee awareness measures and defined response procedures can further strengthen preparedness and support a more coordinated approach to managing cyber threats. How Can Cybersecurity Consulting Services Strengthen Business Security? One of the major results of such cybersecurity consultancy includes increased protection of sensitive information from possible threats. The consultants can help organizations set up appropriate security measures for protecting the confidentiality of client information, financial information, intellectual property and other critical data. This helps minimize the likelihood of expensive data breaches while strengthening trust and confidence among customers, business partners and other stakeholders.  Cybersecurity consulting services can guide businesses to align their security practices with relevant regulatory and sectoral requirements. A better understanding of compliance obligations may also help to mitigate the risk penalties, legal issues and delays that can arise from non-compliance. External expertise can further provide an objective view of security gaps that may be overlooked during internal reviews, helping decision-makers prioritize security investments according to business needs. An improved level of resilience in cybersecurity can help ensure smoother business operations in case of a security incident. A well-prepared organization is able to minimize the disruption, keep its key functions safe and restore itself quickly following a security incident. Availability of specialized knowledge can also alleviate the burden on internal IT teams, especially for those organizations that do not have any specific experts in the area of cybersecurity. What Trends Are Shaping Cybersecurity Consulting Services? The rising trend of adopting cloud native operations is also having an impact on the realm of cybersecurity consulting, especially as organizations manage increasingly distributed digital environments. Zero trust frameworks have become popular as firms begin to shift their paradigm from implicit access controls and begin to adopt continuous verification for users, devices and resources. Consulting engagements are also becoming more focused on identity security, third-party risk and security considerations across software supply chains as organizations rely on a wider network of external platforms and providers. Another key factor is the impact of artificial intelligence, especially as organizations look for ways to speed up their analyses of security events and detect threats in a more proactive manner. Consultants are being engaged for security needs tied to the AI systems themselves, such as data exposure, model misuse and unauthorized access. Demand is also shifting direction towards continuous security monitoring and managed consulting models, allowing organizations to have access to ongoing guidance instead of one-off assessments. These shifts are broadening the role of cybersecurity consulting services as digital operations become more distributed, interconnected and dependent on emerging technologies. ...Read more
Organizations are increasingly looking to upgrade their applications and expand their digital capabilities, making cloud computing essential for improving business performance. Effective management of a cloud environment demands specific skills, constant monitoring, and careful cost control. Managed cloud service providers are crucial in assisting companies to operate efficiently. Current trends show a shift from traditional infrastructure management to integrated services that emphasize security, automation, optimization, and achieving positive business outcomes. What Are the Best Practices for Hybrid and Multicloud Management? Businesses are also increasingly embracing the hybrid and multicloud approach in addressing application needs, compliance issues, resiliency, and flexibility. As such, there is an increased need for organizations to embrace providers that will handle workloads in public cloud, private cloud, and multicloud through unified processes. Rather than having separate approaches for each cloud environment, organizations have been developing capabilities for monitoring, governance, identity management, and performance management on a centralized basis. There has also been significant investment in automation in such areas as provisioning, configuration management, patching, scaling of workloads, and incident response. AI and machine learning continue to play a role in the management of cloud services. Intelligent monitoring may be able to detect odd behavior, predict future capacity needs, and assist with problem-solving efforts. Predictive analysis can also help service providers detect any possible future problems that would negatively impact performance. With the advancement of such technology, companies will be provided with more flexible cloud services without building their own competencies. How Are Providers Improving Cloud Cost And Security? Optimization of costs in cloud computing has emerged as a key corporate concern as more value needs to be derived from technology investments. In response, managed cloud service providers have begun adopting approaches that involve resource analysis, identification of unused capacity, configuration recommendations, and efficient workload management. The FinOps framework has also begun to gain relevance as it involves collaborative efforts from finance, technology, and business stakeholders to align cloud expenses with tangible results. This would help corporations understand their resource consumption and make better technology investments. Security is still closely tied to the emphasis on efficiency. There are growing expectations for managed service providers to incorporate such security capabilities as identity and access management, monitoring, vulnerability management, data protection, and compliance support into daily cloud activities. The traditional approach of viewing security as a distinct function is now being replaced by integrating security controls into the infrastructure and application environment. Other trends include the shift towards an outcome-oriented approach to delivering services. Companies are not only assessing the availability of their infrastructure but have shifted their assessment towards application performance, user experience, resiliency, scalability, and cost effectiveness. Service level agreements are now geared more towards operational outcomes, while dashboarding and analysis provide visibility of performance and utilization. ...Read more
A software engineering and AI analytics purchase can fail long before model accuracy becomes a concern. The bigger challenge is often the handoff between existing infrastructure and new analytics, especially when camera networks and edge devices were never designed to share context. Replacing everything may simplify architecture on paper, but it can strain capital requirements and stretch deployment timelines. Buyers need to know whether a platform can work across existing technology boundaries without turning modernization into a wholesale infrastructure project.  Integration depth is therefore more revealing than the number of AI features on a product sheet. A useful platform should accept heterogeneous inputs and expose their data through a common control layer without forcing every piece of existing hardware to conform to one technical standard. It should also preserve the usefulness of legacy assets while making their information accessible to newer analytics. That matters in distributed environments where hardware replacement may be slow or economically unjustified. The real question is whether modernization can proceed around installed infrastructure rather than requiring a clean slate.  Real-time analytics creates an attention problem of its own. Video feeds and sensor events can overwhelm staff when every detection is treated as equally important. Buyers should examine how a platform separates routine activity from events that merit human review, and then look at how quickly those events reach the people responsible for validation. The difference between raw monitoring and useful analytics lies in this filtering step. A system that produces more alerts without improving prioritization merely transfers workload from observation to triage.  Architecture becomes more consequential as data volumes rise. Sending every high-definition stream to a centralized cloud environment can create avoidable bandwidth costs and response delays. Edge processing can reduce that burden when analytics are performed close to the source and only selected information moves upstream. Yet edge deployment introduces management demands. Devices and application services still need a coherent way to exchange information and support later investigation. Buyers should also examine how much infrastructure complexity is added when analytics move closer to the source.  “ CFBD ’s hybrid architecture connects legacy environments to newer computing infrastructure through hyperconvergence and virtualization.” Searchability deserves equal importance. Once video or sensor data has been transformed into structured metadata, teams should be able to move from live detection to later investigation without manually reviewing hours of footage. Useful systems retain descriptive attributes and behavioral context in forms that can be queried quickly. The buying question is whether that context survives across live monitoring and retrospective analysis rather than being trapped in separate workflows. Fast retrieval matters because delayed investigation can erase much of the advantage gained from real-time detection.  CFBD merits consideration for buyers facing this mix of integration pressure and analytics workload. Its AZOR Ecosystem, a real-time data orchestration platform, centralizes video and sensor information. AZOR Panel, a centralized monitoring interface, receives AI-filtered events for human validation. AZOR Analytics, a video analytics component, supports real-time and forensic analysis, while edge gateways can process video near the source and pass lighter event data upstream. Its hybrid architecture connects legacy environments to newer computing infrastructure through hyperconvergence and virtualization. The fit is strongest where replacement costs and operator overload are material constraints. For organizations that need AI analytics without discarding usable infrastructure, CFBD is a practical choice.  ...Read more