-
Technology
-
Industry
-
Solutions
-
- ASSET MANAGEMENT
- CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE MANAGEMENT
- CYBER SECURITY
- DATA CENTER
- DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT
- ELECTRONIC DATA INTERCHANGE
- ENTERPRISE DATA MANAGEMENT
- ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING
- ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT
- ENTERPRISE-GRADE WEB DATA SOLUTIONS
- FACILITY MANAGEMENT
- FIELD SERVICE
- IDENTITY AND ACCESS MANAGEMENT
- INFRASTRUCTURE
- IT SERVICE MANAGEMENT
- MANAGED IT SERVICES
- PAYMENT AND CARD
- PROJECT MANAGEMENT
- SOFTWARE TESTING
- STORAGE
- VIDEO SOLUTIONS
- WORKFLOW
-
-
Platforms
-
Functions
- Leadership Perspectives
- Innovation Insights
- Research
- Magazines
- News
- CXO Awards
Robotic Machining Adoption on the Rise in Aerospace Industry
CIO Review
FREMONT, CA: Robots are proving to be flexible tools for aircraft manufacturing and assembly. Their full potential however can be limited by the challenges of programming a robot in a CAD/CAM environment. Software that integrates offline programming, simulation, code generation, and path optimization makes the process seamless and error-free.
Unlike their land-bound cousins, aircraft have key differences that defy the automation paradigm. In Aerospace industry manufacturing tolerances are much tighter, while the subassemblies tend to be significantly larger and heavier. Compared to automotive, aircraft production volumes are much lower, while the life expectancy of commercial aircraft is measured in decades, not years. Global demand for aircraft is rising, straining current manufacturing resources.
The Advanced Manufacturing Research Centre with Boeing (AMRC) is on the frontlines of this industry trend. “Sales of commercial aircraft are increasing,” says Ben Morgan, head of the Integrated Manufacturing Group at AMRC. “The majority of manufacturers have pushed their production capacity to the absolute limit and further capital investments are needed to reach the targeted rate. For some platforms we’re working on, this might be up to 60 aircraft a month, which is an incredible amount. So a step change in manufacturing is needed.” That step change is coming in the form of flexible robotic automation. Ushering the robots’ foray was the advent of composites in aircraft component manufacturing.
Stay ahead of the industry with exclusive feature stories on the top companies, expert insights and the latest news delivered straight to your inbox. Subscribe today.
Rise of Aerospace Composites According to a study by market research firm Lucintel, the global aerospace composites market is expected to reach $112 billion annually by 2017, with a compound annual growth rate of 5.3 percent over the next five years (source: CompositesWorld). Composites typically weigh 20 percent less than aluminum and have a longer life span than traditional metallic materials. Credited for higher strength-to-weight ratios, better fuel efficiency and longer service intervals, composite aircraft materials are vital to the aerospace industry.
The composites revolution helped extend the jet way to robots. Robotic machining and material removal is increasingly being used in nonmetallic and metallic applications, including milling, drilling, surfacing, riveting, and waterjet cutting and trimming of composite skins and components for large commercial aircraft.
Prime for Robotic Machining
For years robots were peering over the shoulders of their computer numerically controlled counterparts. Now the focus has shifted. “With advances in robotics over the last 10 years, serial-arm devices are becoming a more feasible option,” says Morgan. “There’s been a boom in interest in robotic trimming, routing and machining. By developing concept robotic trimming systems and the facility we have at the AMRC, we’re starting to prove to high-end automotive and aerospace manufacturers that flexible cells are an alternative to some of the traditional, expensive CNC machine tools.”
The AMRC was established in 2001 as a collaboration between the University of Sheffield and Boeing. Located in a sprawling high-tech industrial park in Sheffield, England, it employs more than 400 researchers and engineers focused on modernizing manufacturing by testing and proving different technologies, and has more than 100 member companies ranging from global aerospace giants to local small businesses.
“We’re talking maybe $15 million for some of the big CNC machines that are being used to manufacture these aerospace parts,” says Morgan. “For a robotic cell we would probably be looking at a couple of hundred thousand dollars.” The cost of deploying robots continues to decline, while their rigidity and accuracy is improving. Robotic technology can now compete for a broad range of aerospace applications previously limited to custom machinery, including one-up assembly, drilling and filling, automated tape layup (ATL), and automated fiber placement (AFP).
Robot Programming the Hard Way Most top-tier aerospace suppliers recognize the advantages of deploying robots for their subassembly operations and have even earmarked annual budgets for robotization. But for some, robot programming is the quagmire. Singularity, calibration, collisions, reach limitations, and motion granularity are uniquely complex to robotic systems and can make programming robots for machining operations particularly cumbersome. Navigating around the errors can be time-consuming. Companies accustomed to using CNC machine tools get stuck when they try to deploy a robot for the first time. They often try to use the robot manufacturer’s software for programming. However, this software is typically intended for simulation purposes, not programming. In a simulation environment you can see the error, but the difficulty lies in identifying the cause and how to fix it.
A different approach is to try to use CAD/CAM point converters, which create robot trajectories for different types of applications. The point converters tend to do a quick and inexpensive conversion to a robotic system, but there is no way to validate kinematics and check for errors. The main problem with these methods is the lack of a path optimization tool. Once the program is applied to the robot, there may be a lengthy prove-out period.
Check Out :
Top Aerospace Manufacturing Companies
“When we decided to buy a new solution to tool composite parts with a robot, we could not have imagined how different the robotics world was from our traditional CNC machine world,” says Eddy Coubard, CAD & CAM production engineering manager at SOGERMA COMPOSITES AQUITAINE. “New vocabulary, a new working method and new problems, it was a challenge.”
Celebrating its 30th anniversary, SOGERMA COMPOSITES AQUITAINE is a wholly owned subsidiary of SOGERMA Group, and is based in France with 475 production and R&D personnel supporting more than 100 major suppliers in Europe and around the world with highperformance composite material products. “We tool aeronautic composite parts in small quantities, which means we have to get the robot programming right the first time,” says Coubard. “Otherwise, our costs increase dramatically.”
“The first robotic software we tried was not efficient at all,” he says. “It required making the tool path in CAD/CAM software and writing a kind of G-code with a post-processor, then reading this G-code on a simulator, only to realize that most of the time there were errors. Then we had to go back to the CAD/CAM software and write the robot code through another post-processor.” This is the typical scenario. A company acquires a robot, tries to deploy it for a machining operation, only to realize that they don’t have the proper software for the job.
First Step, Software
A better strategy: Consider the robot programming software up front. This should be done either at the time of robot system acquisition, or even prior to the purchase. CAD/CAM software specifically designed for programming robots addresses issues with singularity, collisions, joint limits, reach issues and wrist flips. The right software should automatically calculate and optimize robot trajectories, seamlessly integrate external axes, and provide instant visual feedback. It should be easy to use, even for operators new to robotics. The software should also support offline programming, without interrupting production on the shop floor other than for the final test and fine-tuning. Changeovers then become a parallel, rather than a sequential, operation.
Recently named one of the 10 Most Promising Engineering Design Solution Providers by CIO Review magazine, Jabez Technologies Inc. of Montreal, Canada, released the first CAD/CAMbased offline robot programming software in 2002. The latest version of Robotmaster® software streamlines programming, simulation, code generation and path optimization into one integrated solution. All major robot models are supported.
“A robot can be a difficult device to manage,” says Chahe Bakmazjian, president of Jabez Technologies. “It consists of six rotary joints stacked one on top of the other, so it’s very difficult to anticipate errors. Usually you encounter the error when it happens. There’s no warning.” “Aircraft manufacturers often put large robotic systems in place, but they’re only exploiting them to a limited area where they know they can avoid errors,” says Bakmazjian. “Any time they want to go outside those areas, it becomes very restrictive.”
COMPOSITES AQUITAINE’s Coubard says that by replacing their old software their programming time was reduced by two to three times.
“Robotmaster allows us to work in the same way we used our CNC machines to tool parts,” he says. “Since Robotmaster also interfaces with Mastercam® software, we were able to quickly and easily perform full 7-axis milling and drilling.”
Coubard says they are using Robotmaster to program a rail-mounted 6-axis robot. Applications include tooling thermal protection parts made of glass fiber for the Airbus A330 airliner and honeycomb for the Airbus Super-Puma MK II helicopter.
“With Robotmaster we’re able to embrace the world of robotics. Now we can tool our composite parts in the same easy way we used to tool them with the CNC machine,” says Coubard. “In fact, the new simulation feature is so powerful that we have yet to exploit all of its capabilities.” Without Robotmaster, Coubard says they would have most likely abandoned robotics and gone back to old CNC machining methods.
Error-Free Programming At the AMRC, Morgan’s group uses robotics and metrology to develop new methods for assembling complex products for aerospace and other high-value industries. “We’ve been working with Robotmaster for the last three years,” says Morgan. “The software has allowed our operators and engineers to quickly and effectively reprogram the cell, as well as optimize the machine path. It has great flexibility and control.”
“Using this software lends itself to the research environment in particular, because our range of work and part variability,” says Morgan. “We don’t manufacture anything here, so often we end up doing one, two, or three parts and then we’ll move on to another part. But the aerospace sector itself is demanding reconfigurability as well, so we’re meeting that requirement with Robotmaster.”
Operators report that the software works 100 percent of the time – the first time – without the need for manual teaching intervention or touch-up. It’s error-free robot programming without the complexity. So easy, even a newbie can use it. Couple a flexible robot with an advanced software solution. Now you’re free to exploit the entire robot workspace. What first appeared as a liability of an overdetermined system with various ways to reach the same point has now become an opportunity given sophisticated path optimization tools.
Robots have proven their airworthiness. They just need the right software to realize their full potential.
Check Out: The Manufacturing Outlook
More in News
AI data cloud solutions are rapidly reshaping how organizations handle large-scale information flows, as businesses move toward more connected and intelligence-driven digital environments. Companies are increasingly adopting unified cloud frameworks that combine advanced analytics with AI capabilities, enabling faster data processing and more responsive decision-making across operations.
This shift is also improving scalability and system efficiency, though challenges around data security, integration complexity and governance continue to demand stronger architectural planning. In response, organizations are refining cloud strategies with more structured data management practices and enhanced security protocols to maintain reliability while supporting continuous innovation.
What Are the Key Benefits of AI Data Cloud?
AI data cloud delivers significant advantages by improving how organizations extract value from vast and diverse data sets. By bringing together structured and unstructured information into a unified environment, it allows deeper insights that support more accurate forecasting and strategic planning. This capability helps organizations move beyond surface-level analysis and build a more comprehensive understanding of operational patterns, customer behavior and market dynamics.
Another important benefit is the speed and flexibility it introduces into data-driven processes. With faster access to insights, decision cycles become shorter and more responsive to changing conditions. This agility supports better coordination across departments and helps organizations adapt quickly to shifting priorities without disrupting ongoing activities. It also reduces dependency on fragmented data systems, creating a more streamlined and efficient flow of information across business functions.
AI data cloud strengthens overall operational resilience by improving consistency and reliability in data usage. Automated data handling reduces manual effort and minimizes the risk of errors, ensuring that information remains accurate and dependable over time. This structured approach supports stronger compliance practices and enhances trust in data-driven decisions, helping organizations operate with greater confidence in complex and evolving environments.
What is the Future Outlook of AI Data Cloud Solutions?
AI data cloud solutions are expected to advance toward more autonomous and context-aware data ecosystems, where systems can interpret patterns, prioritize insights and initiate actions with minimal manual direction.
Growing integration of machine learning models with dynamic data pipelines is likely to support more proactive decision environments, where insights are not only generated faster but are also aligned more closely with real-time operational needs. This progression is set to refine how organizations anticipate changes, manage complexity and respond to emerging demands across digital environments.
Simultaneously, the evolution of decentralized data architectures and edge computing is anticipated to reshape how data is processed and accessed across distributed networks. Greater emphasis on interoperability standards and secure data exchange frameworks will support more seamless collaboration between platforms while maintaining control over sensitive information. These developments are positioning AI data cloud solutions as a core element in building more adaptive, scalable and intelligence-driven digital infrastructures. ...Read more
Enterprise innovation sandboxes often lose their usefulness at the boundary between experimentation and production. A team may prove an idea quickly, then encounter weeks of access requests, security reviews and infrastructure dependencies before the work can enter the enterprise environment. For executives assessing a sandbox, the relevant distinction is whether it merely creates a protected place to experiment or shortens the path from an approved idea to deployable work.
Production similarity deserves close scrutiny. A sandbox that operates under different tools or controls can make early development seem faster while delaying integration work. The stronger model reflects the conditions a team will eventually face, including access rules and deployment requirements. Governance then becomes part of development rather than a review layer added later. That matters particularly for AI work, where an experiment can be easy to demonstrate but much harder to sustain once enterprise data and release practices come into play.
Self-service creates another procurement problem. Removing every gate may increase speed during experimentation, but it can also leave IT having to rebuild control later. Excessive centralization has the opposite effect, forcing routine provisioning through ticket queues and approval chains. Buyers should assess whether administrators can establish reusable policies and templates while giving teams room to provision approved resources themselves. The practical measure is not unrestricted autonomy. It is how much waiting and repeated setup the environment removes without separating experimentation from enterprise oversight.
“The Calibo model works with existing enterprise systems rather than requiring their replacement and connects experimentation to a controlled Path to Production.”
Compatibility with the existing technology estate is equally important. Large enterprises rarely have a clean stack that can be replaced around a new sandbox. Multiple clouds may coexist with legacy systems, while development work passes between specialized tools and data platforms. A sandbox that demands wholesale replacement can turn adoption into another modernization program. Buyers need to understand how the environment coordinates work across existing systems and whether generated artifacts remain inspectable and modifiable rather than being locked inside the platform.
Data readiness can expose the same weakness. Requiring every possible source to be prepared before experimentation begins creates unnecessary groundwork, yet loosely governed sample data may produce a result that cannot survive production review. A useful sandbox should let teams establish the trusted data required for a defined use case, preserve traceability and expand that foundation as the work progresses. This keeps data preparation proportional to the idea being tested while preserving a credible route beyond the prototype.
That balance between usable data and production readiness is built into the Calibo approach. Calibo provides a Business Innovation Sandbox, a governed environment designed to mirror production conditions. It gives teams role-based tools and workflows. IT can predefine approved configurations and access rules through policies and templates, allowing teams to provision what they need without sending every request through a manual approval queue. Its model works with existing enterprise systems rather than requiring their replacement. Calibo’s Path to Production provides a controlled release process for moving validated work into enterprise or Calibo-managed environments while IT retains control over deployment requirements. Calibo also applies Minimum Viable Data to establish the trusted, governed data required for a specific use case instead of preparing every possible source in advance. These mechanics address the central procurement risk of creating a sandbox that accelerates prototypes but leaves production friction untouched. Calibo merits consideration where enterprises need experimentation to remain governed and connected to eventual deployment. ...Read more
A business intelligence platform chosen at the regional headquarters may seem ready for use across Latin America. That impression can change once country teams begin connecting their data. Financial records may be held in separate systems, and a sales category used in one market may carry a different label in another. The platform can place the figures on one dashboard, but that does not mean they can be compared reliably.
Treating the region as a single reporting environment can hide these differences. The interface may look consistent even when each country records information differently. One team might recognize revenue when an order is placed, while another waits until delivery. Both figures can appear in the same report without representing the same stage of a sale.
Currency conversion can tell a different story from the one local teams are seeing. Managers may track rising sales in national currency, only to find that the regional report shows a decline once those figures are converted. Keeping the local numbers alongside the consolidated results helps explain whether performance changed or the exchange rate did.
Language raises a more routine concern. Spanish and Portuguese interfaces help, but translated menus alone do not make a platform suitable for local use. Field names and reporting instructions must match the language employees use at work. If a label seems unfamiliar, teams may interpret it differently and enter information inconsistently.
The picture becomes less reliable when some information comes from distributors or other outside parties. They may submit reports on different schedules or use formats that do not match internal systems. Recent figures from one country could then appear beside older information from another. The dates may be visible somewhere in the system, but users can still overlook them when reviewing a regional total.
Country teams may also find that a standardized report leaves out details needed to explain local performance. A sales decline could follow a temporary supply interruption rather than weaker demand. A late delivery might affect one reporting period without pointing to a broader customer problem. Managers need some way to record that context without preparing a separate presentation for every review.
Giving each market complete control over its reporting structure is not a practical answer either. Too much variation would make regional comparisons harder and add work during consolidation. Some definitions need to remain consistent across the business. Other fields may need to vary because they explain conditions specific to a country.
These decisions are best made before the dashboard has been finalized. Data owners in each market can identify conflicting definitions and delays in the reporting cycle. Regional teams can then correct differences that would distort comparisons while clearly marking those that cannot be removed.
Buyers should look beyond whether a BI platform can display information from several Latin American markets. The more useful question is what happens when that information does not follow the same definitions or reporting timetable. A regional dashboard becomes dependable only when it shows those local differences clearly instead of covering them with a uniform design. ...Read more
Parking management solutions that incorporate technology, sensors, automation, and data analysis address significant urbanization challenges. They enhance parking operations, optimize space utilization, and improve the overall user experience. As cities strive to become smarter, these solutions are increasingly integrated into modern transportation systems. In contrast, traditional parking systems often rely on monitoring and static management, resulting in inefficient space usage, longer search times, and higher costs.
Smart parking solutions do better by providing real-time information, automated access control, digital payment systems and guidance that helps drivers find parking spots. Modern platforms can handle on-street and off-street parking, allowing operators to manage facilities from a dashboard. Users get real-time information on parking availability and easy entry and exit experiences. As transportation networks become connected, smart parking management supports more efficient and sustainable city mobility.
Enhanced Parking Solutions for Efficient Management
Using sensors, cameras and other devices to keep track of which parking spaces are available so the people in charge can see what is going on and make the parking facility run smoothly. Smart parking systems help people find parking spaces more easily, which means they do not have to drive around the parking facility as much. Makes people happier when they are parking. These systems can read license plates and let people in without them having to take a ticket, which reduces the need for people to be involved and helps things run smoothly when it is busy.
The way people pay for parking has become easier due to the ability to use phones or computers for transactions. The development increases convenience for those parking their vehicles and streamlines the payment collection process for parking facility operators. Parking facility managers can monitor activities across multiple locations, enabling them to optimize planning and resource allocation. They have access to real-time data on facility occupancy, revenue generation, and equipment functionality. The use of specialized analytical tools allows for the prediction of peak parking times.
The information aids in determining pricing strategies and the number of parking spaces needed at any given time. The equipment within parking facilities is often connected to the internet, enhancing management capabilities. Facility operators can identify malfunctions promptly and schedule preventative maintenance, reducing potential issues. By leveraging automation, connectivity, and operational intelligence, smart parking management solutions promote efficient operations within parking facilities.
Rising Need for Parking Management
People want parking management solutions because cities and businesses need to manage the increasing number of vehicles and make the most of the limited parking spaces they have. The fact that more and more people are moving to cities is a reason for this demand. As cities get more crowded, it becomes really important to manage parking in a way to reduce traffic and make the transportation system better. Cities are trying to become smarter by using technologies. They are investing in systems that can manage traffic and parking together.
“Artificial intelligence, connected mobility ecosystems and greater integration with intelligent transportation infrastructure will drive the future of parking management solutions.”
Commercial real estate people are using parking technologies to make visitors happy to use their facilities in a better way and increase the value of their properties. The use of vehicles is changing the way parking is managed. Now parking facilities need to have charging stations, systems to reserve parking spots and ways to manage energy. The goal of being more sustainable is also helping the market grow. When people do not have to drive to find parking, they use less fuel, produce fewer emissions, and there is less traffic.
People who manage parking use data to decide how much to charge, predict demand, plan how many parking spots they need, and make long-term investment decisions. The combination of cities getting bigger, the use of technologies and the need to make transportation better is driving investment in smart parking management solutions. Smart parking management solutions are getting more popular because cities, businesses and property owners need them to manage the growing number of vehicles and make the most of the parking resources they have.
Emerging Trends in Smart Parking Management Solutions
Artificial intelligence, connected mobility ecosystems and greater integration with intelligent transportation infrastructure will drive the future of parking management solutions. Parking management is becoming a dynamic part of urban mobility networks. AI will make parking management better by predicting how many spaces will be taken, analyzing traffic flow and automatically assigning parking spots. AI systems can help people who manage parking lots make sure they have enough spaces available when people need them.
IoT will keep getting bigger, leading to more connected parking infrastructure with advanced sensors, smart cameras and intelligent gateways that give us information all the time. Smart parking management solutions will work with navigation systems, mobility applications and digital transportation platforms so drivers can find out if there are parking spaces available before they get to where they're going. As cities invest in transportation infrastructure, smart parking management solutions will become more important for making cities better, more efficient and more sustainable. ...Read more
