-
Technology
-
Industry
-
Solutions
-
- ASSET MANAGEMENT
- AUGMENTED & VIRTUAL REALITY
- COLLABORATION
- CONVERSATIONAL
- CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE MANAGEMENT
- CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT
- CYBER SECURITY
- DATA CENTER
- DIGITAL CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE
- DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT
- EHS SOFTWARE
- ELECTRONIC DATA INTERCHANGE
- ENTERPRISE DATA MANAGEMENT
- ENTERPRISE DATA QUALITY MONITORING
- ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING
- ENTERPRISE RISK MANAGEMENT
- ENTERPRISE-GRADE WEB DATA SOLUTIONS
- FACILITY MANAGEMENT
- FIELD SERVICE
- GAMIFICATION
- IDENTITY AND ACCESS MANAGEMENT
- INFRASTRUCTURE
- IT SERVICE MANAGEMENT
- MANAGED IT SERVICES
- PAYMENT AND CARD
- PROJECT MANAGEMENT
- SOFTWARE TESTING
- STORAGE
- VIDEO SOLUTIONS
- WORKFLOW
-
-
Platforms
-
Functions
- Leadership Perspectives
- Innovation Insights
- Research
- Magazines
- News
- CXO Awards
Why Companies Should Test and Verify Before Migrating to Office 365
CIO Review
Secured and infallible medium of communication is the basis for the exchange of data between departments in an organization. In the absence of the right tools, companies have to deal with the clutter and heaps of data in form of paper work, bills, and files. It is by grace of constant evolution in information technology, communication in organizations has become very feasible. E-mail served as a predominant business information exchange tool but, to keep pace with the ongoing evolution, companies need to make strategic approach to implement new solutions that can manage myriad of information. Understanding the need, Microsoft nailed the situation by introducing ‘Microsoft Office 365’ for organizations. However it is often advised for companies to test and thoroughly understand Office 365 before migrating completely.
Migrating to Office 365
Stay ahead of the industry with exclusive feature stories on the top companies, expert insights and the latest news delivered straight to your inbox. Subscribe today.
Use of POP3 or IMAP protocols for emails can be a bit tricky while migrating to Office 365 as it replaces previous protocols with its own mechanism. Similarly, to use Microsoft Office 365, companies need to chalk-out their migration strategies as they have to transfer every email activity on cloud. Whereas, companies using Outlook just need to create PST files to exchange mail and address books. Migrating to office 365 is quite simple; just follow two plain steps if not an ‘Exchange user’. First, implement SharePoint and SSO/Active Directory to setup Office 365 hosted Exchange environment. Then transfer mailbox, as second step, once the first phase is completed.
Firms often find it difficult to send emails if they are not using Outlook. Consequently, they experience a common snag of low level compatibility between them and difficulty in mailbox conversion with perplexing features. But these companies recommend preserving Outlook licenses, getting the pilot-test done, and then migrating from Outlook to Office 365 using 2 simple steps.
At the end, companies also need to validate mail settings and the shared resources to start working on live data involving manual intervention to some extent. Therefore, it is wise to transfer a whole group at once to lessen the migration-burden and measure performance by involving regular users. Implementing a new email tool is not an easy job as organizations need to incorporate new features and scrub out what they are accustomed to. But a robust and foolproof planning can boost performance further for better email communication.
Leveraging Security for Data
Organizations can access their secured and omni-present data through Microsoft Office 365 cloud email solution. In fact, it is becoming one of the trusted tools for companies. Microsoft Office 365 facilitates security and exchange of data by including certain encryption methods while sharing data. The software makes sure that exchange credentials, emails, contact details, calendar, and other attachments are securely managed and cached using encryption key. Security features not only secures data for organizations but it also meets user expectations to enhance user satisfaction level.
Medium of connection is placed over ‘Transport Layer Security (TLS)’ ensuring high level encryption key AES-128 encircle original data. The key is used to decrypt the password in the cloud while accessing the data. Furthermore, admins have privilege to block some of the features using ‘Mobile Device Management (MDM)’ products or ‘ActiveSync Device Management’ procedures, and remote accessing devices.
Office 365 encourages the multi-factor ‘Active Directory Authentication Library (ADAL)’ based authentication with ‘Mobile Device Management (MDM)’ that prevents users copying data to and from the non-MDM devices. It also secures system without changing user-behavior.
Benefits of Office 365
Office 365’s strong performance attracted 440 customers in 2013 including giants such as Burger King and Campbell and the number seems to be still growing. In second quarter of financial year 2015, Office 365 alone contributed with 88 percent of revenue growth upto $8Bn. The success of office 365 lies behind its simple user interface (UI) as it maintains data even after using with other email tools. The tool is again popular with customers of ‘Skyhigh Network’ where 87.3 percent of customers are able to upload 1.37TB of data each month.
With cloud compatibility, small enterprises can gain more advantages by storing data over cloud to sustain any major disaster. Office 365 also allows organizing meetings, emails, and contacting management for small business. Users can update any contact, reschedule meetings, or make necessary changes in documents through mobile device and same changes reflect on all the devices synchronized with it.
One of the major advantages of Office 365 is its strategic association that allows users to communicate through instant cloud collaboration instead of using faxes, emails, or phone calls. Leading companies in the industry use Office 365 to connect with other organizations serving industries such as manufacturing, energy, finance, and many more.
ABB Embraces Office 365
Online sessions, workshops, and open-line communications were arranged by Microsoft for ABB and its employees. Microsoft was all set to coach ABB employees about Office 365 with its admirable client services. However, it was not easy for the company to transition from existing systems to transfer data to Office 365. The company had a goal to make employees more productive and effective with the new communication tools and achieved it seamlessly. Office 365 was found to be the perfect fit for every need of ABB including to keep employees engaged after evaluating various on-premises and cloud solutions. ABB then geared up for pilot testing before migrating to Office 365 and after gaining knowledge of benefits of using Office 365, the company embraced it as communication medium.
With robust infrastructure provided Office 365, it is evident that it can transform primitive communication methods adopted by organizations as per needs of today’s IT world. It has every possible solution for large companies as well as small and medium enterprises to leverage their communication process through cloud. With its simple but robust features, Office 365 is viewed as the next generation communication tool for enterprises.
More in News
AI agents are exposing a problem that conventional workflow software has rarely solved. Many enterprises run essential work across SaaS platforms, integration tools, local scripts and shared spreadsheets. Agents are then expected to work across all of them, gather enough context and make safe decisions. The difficulty lies in the gap between what an agent can infer and what the business can actually control.
Point-to-point integrations move data but do not preserve the history of a process. iPaaS platforms connect systems, yet long-running work can still end up scattered across queues, callbacks, approvals and exceptions. For buyers, introducing agents is only part of the challenge. They also need a process that can show exactly what happened.
Workflow orchestration can provide that structure when it carries context along with the work instead of simply routing it from one system to another. Agents still need room to exercise judgment, but that judgment needs boundaries. A model might classify an email, interpret intent, retrieve missing context and recommend what should happen next. It should not have to work out the refund procedure or customer verification process from scratch every time a request comes in. Repeatable steps are less expensive to execute through deterministic logic and easier to audit. The agent can then handle the parts that require interpretation while established actions remain within versioned process logic.
“Agents can make decisions where judgment is required while the workflow handles repeatable actions.”
That separation is useful only if the business can see what happened in each workflow. Executives need a way to inspect the process template, runtime history, agent decision and failure path in one place. Once APIs, agents, human reviewers and external events are involved, ordinary system logs do not provide the whole picture. Buyers need to know which action ran, what data moved, what decision was made and what happened when a step timed out or had to be retried. Keeping that information with the process also makes automation easier to improve because performance data remains connected to the work that produced it.
The amount of engineering required to get there matters too. An orchestration platform has limited practical value if a company needs to build a large specialist team before it can put a useful process into production. Existing services and SaaS APIs should be composable into business logic that people can understand and change without rebuilding the entire integration map. A code-first approach is useful when software teams get version control, business reviewers can see the workflow as a visual graph, auditors can trace what happened and agents have a stable process map to work within.
The larger issue is ownership of the process, not simply how many tasks can be automated. Long-running workflows need to retain state, and agent decisions need to remain visible without requiring a model call at every step. Once the process is running, event-driven feedback can show where it needs improvement. The platform also has to work for organizations with different levels of software maturity. One team may be coordinating a large collection of microservices, while another needs custom workflow logic around ERP, CRM, field-service and workforce systems without having to wait for a vendor to add the functionality to its roadmap.
LittleHorse takes this approach with Saddle Command Center and its Business-as-Code model for building workflows across microservices, SaaS platforms, agents and human-in-the-loop steps. Agents can make decisions where judgment is required while the workflow handles repeatable actions. Individual instances remain traceable, and workflow event data can be published to Apache Kafka for analysis. Support for Java, Python, Go and C# also allows engineering teams to maintain the business logic without having to adopt a specialist workflow language. For enterprises working across disconnected SaaS environments or complex microservice estates, LittleHorse provides a practical way to give AI agents room to make decisions while keeping the surrounding process visible and controlled. ...Read more
Sage migration decisions often begin with a contradiction. Finance and IT teams want the subscription feel of SaaS, yet the applications they rely on still carry custom workflows, connected databases, reporting routines and partner-managed changes. A generic cloud host can move the server, but it may leave the business managing every handoff when access breaks or latency appears during a critical task. Month-end close, warehouse workflows, payroll access and reporting cycles leave little room for cloud experiments that behave well only under ideal conditions.
The weak point is usually not migration itself. It is the support chain that follows. Servers sit somewhere, a hosting provider manages the platform, the software publisher owns the application, a Sage consultant handles business logic and the internal team is left to coordinate the room. A single interruption then becomes a routing problem. Executives should favor a hosting model that reduces escalation layers without stripping away control over the ERP.
Control matters because Sage environments rarely behave like standard SaaS tenants. Updates, integrations, VPN links, reporting tools and adjacent applications may need business-specific treatment. Shared resources can look efficient until they limit troubleshooting or change windows. Dedicated virtual environments, network isolation, clear backup design and documented availability standards give leadership a firmer basis for risk decisions. The point is not more infrastructure for its own sake. It is a service model that keeps customization possible while making ownership clearer.
Ransomware risk and phishing exposure have changed the due diligence standard for hosted ERP. Sage access cannot be separated from identity controls, recovery routines, monitoring practices and response authority. A provider that only hosts the application may still leave security teams stitching together evidence after an incident. Before renewal terms are signed, buyers should test how backup frequency, network segmentation, disaster recovery design and incident escalation work in practice.
Cloud economics create a second trap. Public cloud flexibility can turn into variable outlay when workloads are poorly matched to the platform. Licensing shifts and Microsoft choices make architecture a finance issue as much as an IT issue. Lowest monthly price can be misleading when internal staff must manage exceptions or pull multiple suppliers into every problem. A stronger decision weighs contract predictability, application performance, recovery posture and the cost of internal coordination. Sage projects also require a provider that can work alongside ERP partners rather than displace them.
Against that buying logic, Cloud at Work is a premier choice for Sage cloud hosting. It model is built around Sage end users and fewer support handoffs, then extended that base into Azure and managed technology services where the customer environment demands it. Its portfolio spans Virtual Private Cloud, Infrastructure as a Service, Desktop as a Service, Managed Services and Managed Cybersecurity, giving buyers a path from hosted Sage to broader cloud management without changing accountability every time the environment expands. Dedicated resources, virtual firewalls, backup design and Sage-aware support match the pressures that matter most. For leaders who want Sage to feel closer to a managed service while preserving customization, Cloud at Work warrants serious consideration. ...Read more
Digital transformation remains a priority for organizations across Canada, but for many leaders, the challenge is no longer deciding whether to modernize. It is figuring out how to do it without disrupting the systems the business relies on every day.
Many organizations are operating in a mixed environment where old and new technologies must work side by side. Core applications that were implemented years ago still support critical operations. ERP and commercial off-the-shelf platforms have been customized over time to fit unique business processes. Data often lives in multiple systems and cybersecurity concerns continue to grow as organizations expand their use of cloud services, mobile applications and external partners. The result is a level of complexity that can make modernization feel risky, even when change is clearly needed.
This is why successful digital transformation rarely starts with technology. It starts with understanding the business. Leaders need a clear picture of which systems continue to deliver value, where inefficiencies exist and which investments will have the greatest impact. Organizations often spend too much money replacing systems that still serve an important purpose or implementing new solutions before fully understanding the long-term costs. The most effective transformation partners help organizations make informed decisions rather than pushing change for its own sake.
The same practical approach applies to emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence. While AI continues to attract attention, its success depends heavily on the quality of the data behind it. Organizations that struggle with fragmented information, inconsistent processes or weak governance often find it difficult to unlock meaningful value from AI investments. Data modernization, cybersecurity and system modernization are closely connected. Progress in one area often depends on getting the others right.
Security has become another defining factor in successful transformation initiatives. Whether operating in healthcare, education, municipal government or the private sector, Canadian organizations face increasing expectations around privacy, access management and accountability. Security cannot be treated as a separate project that follows modernization efforts. It needs to be built into planning and decision-making from the beginning. Strong governance, clear documentation and defined responsibilities help organizations reduce risk while giving leadership teams confidence that projects remain on track.
Execution is equally important. Many transformation initiatives struggle not because the strategy is wrong but because employees are left behind during the process. New systems, workflows and technologies only create value when people understand how to use them and why the changes matter. Clear communication, realistic timelines and strong change management are often the difference between a successful implementation and an expensive disappointment. For organizations operating across different regions of Canada, bilingual communication and local stakeholder engagement can further influence outcomes.
For organizations looking to modernize in a practical and manageable way, IPSG Technology offers an approach grounded in business realities rather than technology trends. The company combines custom application development, website modernization, cloud services, cybersecurity, data optimization and change enablement to help organizations navigate complex transformation initiatives with confidence.
Its strength lies in helping clients modernize ERP and COTS environments without unnecessary replacement, align AI initiatives with data readiness and incorporate security from the outset. By focusing on clarity, governance and measurable outcomes, IPSG Technology helps organizations move forward without losing sight of operational continuity, budget control and long-term business value. ...Read more
Mid-sized companies often reach a point where data volume has outgrown the reporting habits built around it. Sales systems, finance platforms, customer records and workforce tools accumulate information, yet decision-makers still wait for manually assembled reports or rely on partial views. The buying problem is rarely a shortage of software. It is the cost and coordination burden of connecting systems, preparing reliable data and turning it into useful action without building a large specialist team.
Platform selection should begin with the data foundation. Dashboards and AI models cannot compensate for inconsistent definitions, missing records or poorly governed pipelines. Executives need to know how a platform profiles and cleans data while preserving traceability from source to output. Integration also matters beyond the initial connection. A workable platform must support existing databases and business applications while reducing the amount of custom code required to keep those links current. Migration demands, refresh frequency and access controls deserve scrutiny before implementation begins.
The next pressure is time to proof. Many firms cannot justify a large upfront investment in engineers and data scientists before a use case has shown credible returns. A platform should let a business test a narrow problem and measure model accuracy before committing to broader deployment. Low-code workflow design can shorten that cycle, but ease of configuration must not remove oversight. Buyers should examine how knowledge bases and semantic layers are managed when model outputs affect staff decisions or customer-facing processes.
Access to insight presents a separate test. Static reports remain useful for recurring review, yet business leaders increasingly need answers that were not anticipated when a dashboard was built. Natural-language querying can reduce dependence on report backlogs, provided the platform grounds responses in governed company data and shows enough context for users to judge the result. Predictive functions should be assessed in the same manner. Forecasts are valuable only when teams can understand the inputs and monitor performance before connecting a prediction to a defined next step.
The final buying concern is service depth. Mid-sized firms may adopt a capable platform and still lack the people to design data models or maintain AI workflows. A provider should be able to supply targeted support without turning every change into a consulting project. Subscription or usage-based pricing can lower the entry barrier, though buyers should compare consumption controls and support terms carefully. The strongest fit will combine self-service tools with practical help around implementation and model tuning, backed by ongoing maintenance when internal capacity is limited.
Aidas Technologies is a premier choice for firms that need this combination without assembling separate platforms and specialist teams. Its AI-powered data and analytics platform brings data preparation, reporting, predictive modeling and workflow automation into one environment through low-code tools. The company also offers professional services for setup and custom development, plus model support and continued maintenance, allowing buyers to test focused use cases before scaling. A usage-based subscription model further suits mid-sized organizations that need tighter control over upfront cost. For executives prioritizing faster proof and guided adoption, Aidas Technologies merits serious consideration. ...Read more
