Closing the Gap between AI Access and Business Value
CIOREVIEW >> Artificial Intelligence >> NEWS

Cerrowire

Alicia Kimiagarov, Senior Manager of Data Analytics

Closing the Gap between AI Access and Business Value

Alicia Kimiagarov, Senior Manager of Data Analytics
Alicia Kimiagarov, Senior Manager of Data Analytics, Cerrowire

Alicia Kimiagarov

AI Literacy Strategist

A business user was given access to an enterpriseapproved, low-code AI platform and was told to build an agentic AI solution. On paper, the barriers had been removed: the tool was sanctioned, accessible, and designed to reduce technical complexity. In practice, the employee did not know where to start. They had not been taught what agentic AI could do, how to scope the problem, or what a successful deliverable should look like. Left to figure it out alone, the low-code interface became another layer of complexity. The project was eventually abandoned.

That experience captures a broader problem. Democratizing AI does not create business value by itself. Digital, data, and AI (DDA) literacy has to be built into the operating model surrounding the technology.

Digital literacy combines tool fluency with an understanding of how digital systems support the endto-end workflow. Data literacy includes interpreting and communicating data while understanding quality, context, stewardship, and fitness for use. AI literacy combines effective use with the judgment to understand capabilities, limitations, uncertainty, and when human review must take over. Together, these capabilities are not technical specialties. They are foundational enterprise expectations.

As an advisor on the AI Huntsville Taskforce Workforce Development Committee, I talk with employees across a variety of industries who struggle to use the AI tools their companies provide. The two most common scenarios are failure to adopt, as in the example above, and failure to drive valuable adoption. At a biotech company, a director received an enterprise AI license, but nothing else. There was no formal training, no use-case demonstrations, no peer-to-peer coaching, and no conversations from the VP about where AI could create value. The director ended up using AI only for emails and presentations. Access alone resulted in low confidence and stalledROI.

DDA literacy is not just about how to use these new tools. It’s about managing expectations and mitigating risk. Gartner’s 2026 research on AI-augmented citizen development argues that successful scaling requires organizations to rethink roles and skills, but also decision rights and the technology operating model. As AI implementation spreads, so do the risks of data leakage, technical debt, and misdirected decision-making. McKinsey’s 2026 research likewise found that knowledge and training gaps are the leading barrier to accountable AI implementation.

The AI Huntsville Taskforce fields scenarios across finance, healthcare, biotech, and manufacturing. Organizations are putting AI technologies into employees’ hands faster than they are building the confidence and judgment needed to use those capabilities responsibly.

  Organizations that treat DDA literacy as part of their AI implementation strategy will be better positioned to turn democratized AI access into sustained business value.  

That gap becomes visible in everyday decisions. From a logistics coordinator prioritizing shipments to a VP of Marketing evaluating a new strategic channel, AI can accelerate the analysis, but it cannot be held accountable for decisions. Those with foundational DDA literacy know when to apply the digital tools, how to troubleshoot data concerns, and where human-in-the-loop is most important.

But what does embedding DDA literacy into the operating model look like? There are three primary channels for effective upskilling: formal training tied to the role, embedded learning through real work, and reinforcement from managers and peers.

I have seen how powerful this combination can be. At an aerospace and defense company, an accounting analyst resisted getting access to the company’s in-house enterprise AI tool because they did not understand how it applied to their role. When a peer on their team demonstrated how they had used AI to simplify a 15-tab Excel workbook into two tabs and cut hours of work down to minutes, the analyst saw the art of the possible from a trusted colleague and immediately reached out for access. IT provided a license and assigned basic training. Their manager paired the two accountants and guided them on which real work to practice with. Togetherthey streamlined a combined 20 hours of manual work each week. The manager awarded them a financial incentive through the company’s internal reward-sharing platform. By hosting AIsharing sessions, encouraging peer-to-peer collaboration, and promoting their success to others, the manager established a culture of value-driven AI adoption.

That is also why success should not be judged primarily by license counts, active users, or prompt volume. Early, lowcomplexity use cases can be part of the DDA learning curve, revealing where employees need examples, coaching, or more advanced opportunities. The more important question is whether capability is translating into outcomes: time saved, faster cycle times, better quality, fewer errors, stronger decisions, or other improvements.

The leadership challenge, therefore, is not how broadly AI has been deployed. It is whether the workforce is becoming more capable of creating positive impact. Organizations that treat DDA literacy as part of their AI implementation strategy will be better positioned to turn democratized AI access into sustained business value.

The articles from these contributors are based on their personal expertise and viewpoints, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of their employers or affiliated organizations.