Strategies for Securing IOT Devices
CIOREVIEW >> Data Center >> NEWS

Charter Next Generation

Adam Kohnke, Information Security Manager

Strategies for Securing IOT Devices

Adam Kohnke, Information Security Manager
Adam Kohnke, Information Security Manager, Charter Next Generation

Adam Kohnke is the CEO of XL Security Consultancy, which specializes in cybersecurity risk assessment, security educational content creation, and penetration testing. Adam holds a Master's degree in Cybersecurity and Information Assurance from Capella University, where he graduated with distinction. In his spare time, Adam enjoys camping, traveling abroad with his family, and playing role-playing games.

It went by fast, but as 2024 begins to wind down some estimates project that 210 billion Internet of Things (IoT) devices will be connected as we enter 2025. This includes toys, self-driving cars, smart home devices, video surveillance cameras and much more. These seemingly disparate classes of devices share several common security risks spanning inappropriate data collection, storage or sharing to unauthorized ports of entry to corporate networks, serving as ideal breach vectors for cybercriminals. Cyber risks associated with IoT devices usually emerge due to their low overall cost, compact size, onboard hardware limitations such as low amounts of available memory and commercial purposes where cybersecurity best practices might not be perceived as necessary by the manufacturer. This article will explore cybersecurity considerations that can detect and reduce IoT risk at home or in a commercial setting.

The safe implementation of IoT   

Let’s start by looking at some considerations for procurement, before connecting an IoT device to a home or corporate network. The following areas can help reduce the risk of acquiring insecure IoT devices and include reviewing manufacturer documentation for secure software development practices, performing IoT device hardening, network port filtering, network device isolation, vulnerability management and centralized device management or reporting.

♦ A simple review of the manufacturer’s product website can help determine what software development best practices might be used. This includes mention of a complete lifecycle development process, like unit or regression testing, dynamic or static application security testing, QA processes, and other steps mentioned in frameworks like damage, reproducibility, exploitability, affected users, and discoverability (DREAD) or spoofing, tampering, repudiation, information disclosure, denial (STRIDE).

♦ Pre-contract, third-party risk management (TPRM) processes and reviews. This can include analysis of the IoT supplier’s publicly accessible assets using tools like BitSight or Security Scorecard. It is reasonable to assume if the IoT supplier is exhibiting publicly facing security vulnerabilities these tools can reliably identify, its products are likely insecure as well.

  ​Weekly scans against devices in the IoT subnet or VLAN defined in the previous step help ensure critical security flaws are quickly identified, quickly getting these devices on the radar for prioritized patching

♦ Commitment to bug bounty programs or inclusion in software assurance communities that leverage crowdsourcing to uncover hidden bugs or security flaws. Bug bounties, performed parallel to new software releases can help ensure product safety. These programs help demonstrate that cybersecurity is not an afterthought.

Safeguarding the established IoT Environment

Even if proper due diligence was performed, additional IoT device risks must be carefully weighed. Organizations are then tasked with asking “What considerations or security controls should now be evaluated to ensure secure network operations for IoT devices?” The below list serves as a non-exhaustive set of controls to evaluate, track and improve upon over time to properly secure the organization’s IoT ecosystem:

♦  Ensure asset inventory practices include secure management of IoT devices.  Their small size and restrictive hardware usually will result in the absence of typical remote management and monitoring (RMM) solutions deployed to IoT devices. Organizations may have to maintain IoT asset inventories, device version details or installed software using other means like vulnerability scanning and dynamic host configuration protocol (DHCP) logs. 

♦  Network Segmentation via firewall zones and virtual local area networks (VLAN). IoT devices should typically be placed in isolated portions of the company network, restricted to only the necessary ports, protocols and services, to fulfill their business objectives.

♦  Routine Vulnerability Management efforts. Weekly scans against devices in the IoT subnet or VLAN defined in the previous step help ensure critical security flaws are quickly identified, quickly getting these devices on the radar for prioritized patching.

♦  Ingesting appropriate product security advisories.  Resources like the Center for Internet Security (CIS) and the Multi-State Information Sharing & Analysis Center (MS-ISAC) provide critical resources to learn about IoT-based security vulnerabilities in real-time as they are announced.

♦  Engage in routine third-party penetration testing of the company’s IoT fleet. It is usually helpful to bring in experts with a fresh perspective to poke at this environment to reveal unusual security flaws that are undetected by other controls.

The technology-driven future needs strategic planning and awareness

As we move toward an increasingly interconnected world in 2025, securing the rapidly growing ecosystem of IoT devices becomes not just a necessity but a critical imperative for both individuals and organizations. By taking proactive steps to ensure IoT devices are properly vetted, segmented, and monitored, the risks associated with these devices can be significantly mitigated. From procurement through ongoing management, IoT security integration measures will help safeguard sensitive data, protect networks from cyber threats, and ensure that technological advancements serve as a benefit rather than a vulnerability. By fostering a culture of security awareness and prioritizing robust defense strategies, we can harness the full potential of IoT while minimizing its associated risks, paving the way for a more secure and resilient future.

The articles from these contributors are based on their personal expertise and viewpoints, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of their employers or affiliated organizations.